当前位置:首页 - 人生 >





作者:Dan Nixon

译者:何翔宇 & 张松



Attention is not a resource but a way of being alive to the world


本文选自 Aeon | 取经号原创翻译



‘We are drowning in information, while starving for wisdom.’ Those were the words of the American biologist E O Wilson at the turn of the century. Fastforward to the smartphone era, and it’s easy to believe that our mental lives are now more fragmentary and scattered than ever. The ‘attention economy’ is a phrase that’s often used to make sense of what’s going on: it puts our attention as a limited resource at the centre of the informational ecosystem, with our various alerts and notifications locked in a constant battle to capture it.

“世人被知识淹没,却缺乏智慧。”这是美国生物学家爱德华·威尔逊(E O Wilson)在世纪之交时的发声。快步奔向智能手机时代,我们的精神生活变得比以往更加零碎和分散。“注意力经济”一词时常用来阐述现状:我们的注意力作为有限的资源放置在信息生态系统的中心,各种通知和提示争相占有之。

That’s a helpful narrative in a world of information overload, and one in which our devices and apps are intentionally designed to get us hooked. Moreover, besides our own mental wellbeing, the attention economy offers a way of looking at some important social problems: from the worrying declines in measures of empathy through to the ‘weaponisation’ of social media.


The problem, though, is that this narrative assumes a certain kind of attention. An economy, after all, deals with how to allocate resources efficiently in the service of specific objectives (such as maximising profit). Talk of the attention economy relies on the notion of attention-as-resource: our attention is to be applied in the service of some goal, which social media and other ills are bent on diverting us from. Our attention, when we fail to put it to use for our own objectives, becomes a tool to be used and exploited by others. 


However, conceiving of attention as a resource misses the fact that attention is not just useful. It’s more fundamental than that: attention is what joins us with the outside world. ‘Instrumentally’ attending is important, sure. But we also have the capacity to attend in a more ‘exploratory’ way: to be truly open to whatever we find before us, without any particular agenda.


During a recent trip to Japan, for example, I found myself with a few unplanned hours to spend in Tokyo. Stepping out into the busy district of Shibuya, I wandered aimlessly amid the neon signs and crowds of people. My senses met the wall of smoke and the cacophony of sound as I passed through a busy pachinko parlour. For the entire morning, my attention was in ‘exploratory’ mode. That stood in contrast to, say, when I had to focus on navigating the metro system later that day.


Cacophony/kə'kɒf(ə)nɪ/ n. You can describe a loud, unpleasant mixture of sounds as a cacophony 刺耳的声音

Treating attention as a resource, as implied by the attention-economy narrative, tells us only half of the overall story – specifically, the left half. According to the British psychiatrist and philosopher Iain McGilchrist, the brain’s left and right hemispheres ‘deliver’ the world to us in two fundamentally different ways. An instrumental mode of attention, McGilchrist contends, is the mainstay of the brain’s left hemisphere, which tends to divide up whatever it’s presented with into component parts: to analyse and categorise things so that it can utilise them towards some ends.

按“注意力经济”的观点把注意力当作一种资源,只实现了注意力一半的功能,具体地说是“左半的一边”。英国精神病学家和哲学家伊恩·麦克吉尔克里斯(Iain McGilchrist)发现,大脑的左右半球把世界以两种完全不同的方式呈现给我们。他认为,注意力处于“工具”状态时是大脑左半球在运作,左脑会将呈现的事物分析和归类,分成若干部分再进行处理。

By contrast, the brain’s right hemisphere naturally adopts an exploratory mode of attending: a more embodied awareness, one that is open to whatever makes itself present before us, in all its fullness. This mode of attending comes into play, for instance, when we pay attention to other people, to the natural world and to works of art. None of those fare too well if we attend to them as a means to an end. And it is this mode of paying attention, McGilchrist argues, that offers us the broadest possible experience of the world.


So, as well as attention-as-resource, it’s important that we retain a clear sense of attention-as-experience. I believe that’s what the American philosopher William James had in mind in 1890 when he wrote that ‘what we attend to is reality’: the simple but profound idea that what we pay attention to, and how we pay attention, shapes our reality, moment to moment, day to day, and so on.


It is also the exploratory mode of attention that can connect us to our deepest sense of purpose. Just note how many noninstrumental forms of attention practice lie at the heart of many spiritual traditions. In Awareness Bound and Unbound (2009), the American Zen teacher David Loy characterises an unenlightened existence (samsara) as simply the state in which one’s attention becomes ‘trapped’ as it grasps from one thing to another, always looking for the next thing to latch on to. Nirvana, for Loy, is simply a free and open attention that is completely liberated from such fixations. Meanwhile, Simone Weil, the French Christian mystic, saw prayer as attention ‘in its pure form’; she wrote that the ‘authentic and pure’ values in the activity of a human being, such as truth, beauty and goodness, all result from a particular application of full attention.

而且,也正是探索性的注意力才能让我们和自己内心最深的使命感相连。想想有多少非功能性注意力的实践处于许多宗教传统中的核心位置吧。在《觉悟束缚与解脱》(2009)中,美国禅宗老师戴维·洛伊(David Loy)将一个不开悟的存在状态(即轮回)简单地描述为一个人的注意力在从一件事物到另一件事物的过程中被"困住"的状态,总是在寻找下一件可以依附的事物。按照洛伊的说法,涅槃只是一种完全从这种固定模式中解脱出来的自由和开放的注意力。与此同时,法国基督教神秘主义者西蒙娜·韦尔(Simone Weil)将祈祷视为“纯粹状态”的关注; 她写道,人类活动中的“真实和纯粹”的价值,如真、美和善,都是在人们保持了特殊的全神贯注后而产生的结果。

Fixation /fɪk'seɪʃ(ə)n/ n,stereotyped behavior (as in response to frustration)

The problem, then, is twofold. First, the deluge of stimuli competing to grab our attention almost certainly inclines us towards instant gratification. This crowds out space for the exploratory mode of attention. When I get to the bus stop now, I automatically reach for my phone, rather than stare into space; my fellow commuters (when I do raise my head) seem to be doing the same thing. Second, on top of this, an attention-economy narrative, for all its usefulness, reinforces a conception of attention-as-a-resource, rather than attention-as-experience.


At one extreme, we can imagine a scenario in which we gradually lose touch with attention-as-experience altogether. Attention becomes solely a thing to utilise, a means of getting things done, something from which value can be extracted. This scenario entails, perhaps, the sort of disembodied, inhuman dystopia that the American cultural critic Jonathan Beller talks about in his essay ‘Paying Attention’ (2006) when he describes a world in which ‘humanity has become its own ghost’.

在一个极端的情况下,我们可以想象这样一种情景:我们逐渐完全失去了与作为体验的注意力的联系。注意力成为了一种只可以用来利用的东西,一种完成任务的手段,一种可以从中提取价值的东西。这一情景或许会促成美国文化批评家乔纳森·贝勒(Jonathan Beller)在其2006年的论文《关注》(Paying Attention)中描述一个“人类已经变成了自己的幽灵”的世界时所谈论的那种无形的、非人道的反乌托邦。

While such an outcome is extreme, there are hints that modern psyches are moving in this direction. One study found, for instance, that most men chose to receive an electric shock rather than be left to their own devices: when, in other words, they had no entertainment on which to fix their attention. Or take the emergence of the ‘quantified self’ movement, in which ‘life loggers’ use smart devices to track thousands of daily movements and behaviours in order to (supposedly) amass self-knowledge. If one adopts such a mindset, data is the only valid input. One’s direct, felt experience of the world simply does not compute.


leave to (one's) own devices: 1. To allow (someone) to do as he or she pleases: left the child to her own devices for an hour. 2. To force (someone) to cope or manage without assistance: Most people would die in the desert if left to their own devices.

Thankfully, no society has reached this dystopia – yet. But faced with a stream of claims on our attention, and narratives that invite us to treat it as a resource to mine, we need to work to keep our instrumental and exploratory modes of attention in balance. How might we do this?


To begin with, when we talk about attention, we need to defend framing it as an experience, not a mere means or implement to some other end.


Next, we can reflect on how we spend our time. Besides expert advice on ‘digital hygiene’ (turning off notifications, keeping our phones out of the bedroom, and so on), we can be proactive in making a good amount of time each week for activities that nourish us in an open, receptive, undirected way: taking a stroll, visiting a gallery, listening to a record.


Perhaps most effective of all, though, is simply to return to an embodied, exploratory mode of attention, just for a moment or two, as often as we can throughout the day. Watching our breath, say, with no agenda. In an age of fast-paced technologies and instant hits, that might sound a little … underwhelming. But there can be beauty and wonder in the unadorned act of ‘experiencing’. This might be what Weil had in mind when she said that the correct application of attention can lead us to ‘the gateway to eternity … The infinite in an instant.’



网站域名 qujinghao.com,即“取经号”的全拼


后台回复 外刊,获取《经济学人》等原版外刊获得方法


扫描 二维码,关注跑得快的取经号(id: J2West


网站简介 联系我们 网站申明 网站地图

版权所有:www.peripheralsurveys.com ©2017 欧耶娱乐